*Board iSonic Speed 58

[kapten-k]

Säljer du din warp 56 billigt till mig nu då?

[jester]

Den sålde jag billigt i höstas. Har numera en CA Sp 53…

[lasso]

Jester;598027 wrote:

Den sålde jag billigt i höstas. Har numera en CA Sp 53…

Har något forum (tidning eller internet) gjort ett riktigt test av marknadens olika Speedbrädor ännu? JP/Exocet/Starboard/C.A./F2 etc.
/hade varit kul att se
Lasso,

[andersbq]

Lasso;598041 wrote:

Har något forum (tidning eller internet) gjort ett riktigt test av marknadens olika Speedbrädor ännu? JP/Exocet/Starboard/C.A./F2 etc.
/hade varit kul att se
Lasso,

Finns nog inga tidningar som vågar göra ett oberoende test av slalom eller speedbrädor. Det närmsta man kommer sådana tester är nog Marcus/Markus, dock så publicerar de inte resultaten, utan man får liksom vara med på tävlingen och titta i resultatlistan.

[erik-loots]

All my reviews are based on facts, sometimes this is painfull when I find something that doesn’t work that good. But in articles like speed special W58

But I learned about 95% off all gear that didn’t really work was because I didn’t 100% understand the tuning of that windsurfpart…

A review after one short session is for me unbelievable, I prefer many setups tested before publishing a review. Those windsurfmagazine tests are done is a short period with multiple sails or boards. I recon the testers surf at most 30min per sail/board, just because there is not enough time/money.

In 30min I always say the marketing and everything you heard before has a to big effect on the results. It simply takes some time to find out if the board really behaves like the producer promises.

I don’t believe surfmagazines intend to prefer boards/sails of bigger brands (that will pay more ads money). It is simply because testing of windsurfinggear isn’t serious enough yet… I hope to make a change by getting more experience and knowledge, and use this knowledge to write real tests on speedsurfingblog.com for the worldwide web.

[lasso]

very interesting comments. / L

Erik Loots;598136 wrote:

All my reviews are based on facts, sometimes this is painfull when I find something that doesn’t work that good. But in articles like speed special W58

But I learned about 95% off all gear that didn’t really work was because I didn’t 100% understand the tuning of that windsurfpart…

A review after one short session is for me unbelievable, I prefer many setups tested before publishing a review. Those windsurfmagazine tests are done is a short period with multiple sails or boards. I recon the testers surf at most 30min per sail/board, just because there is not enough time/money.

In 30min I always say the marketing and everything you heard before has a to big effect on the results. It simply takes some time to find out if the board really behaves like the producer promises.

I don’t believe surfmagazines intend to prefer boards/sails of bigger brands (that will pay more ads money). It is simply because testing of windsurfinggear isn’t serious enough yet… I hope to make a change by getting more experience and knowledge, and use this knowledge to write real tests on speedsurfingblog.com for the worldwide web.